I recently had an opportunity to talk one-on-one with none other than David Coleman, WLAN sage and author. Those of us in the Wi-Fi world know him as a frequent speaker at industry events, and as half of the writing duo that brought us that big honkin’ CWNA study guide. David is prolific in his wireless evangelism, so it’s easy to forget that he’s also the Director of Product Marketing for Extreme Networks… the big showoff.
I stole that picture from extreme, BTW. So what did my fellow CWNE and I talk about?
Well, Wi-Fi of course. The state of things now, and where it’s going. We shared skepticism and optimism, and I also gained some perspective from David that I hadn’t yet developed as I look forward to Wi-Fi’s coming days. Time spent with Mr. C is time well spent. What follows are some of the more salient points from our banter.
6 GHz is The Thing
One of the first things I hit David with was my skepticism on how the Wi-Fi standards roll out- lots of hyped up promises of ridiculously high throughput and heavily marketed features that end up never really working (MU-MIMO, anyone?). Where I might piss and moan that the IEEE 802.11 working group has lost it’s freakin’ mind, David is a lot more of a gentleman about things. I squawk about features in the standards that the vendors marketing teams convince us to pay for at premium prices but that aren’t real-world usable, and David talks me down.
“The features in the standards can be a bit decoupled from reality, sure… but 6 GHz is what we should be excited about.”
OK. That I can live with. There are SOME features that David says are more likely to eventually impress for real, but we’ll get to those in a minute. Throughout our conversation, the new 6 GHz spectrum that came with 802.11ax is where David’s enthusiasm is rooted. For now, it breaks us out of the downsides that come with the double-edged sword of backwards compatibility in Wi-Fi. Sure, eventually Wi-Fi 7’s 6 GHz will be backwards compatible with Wi-Fi 6E, but that is far less performance-sucking than 802.11ax being backwards compatible with 802.11b. 6 GHz is new, expansive and in many ways a clean RF canvas.
David says that we should be thinking critically about how we actually use 6 GHz, and maybe we ought to reserve it for our mission-critical clients like corporate devices while relegating guests and utility devices to 2.4 and 5 GHz rather than simply repeat the common all SSIDS in both bands habits of the past.
I pointed out that in my own 6 GHz deployments, I’m seeing around 5% (give or take 2%) 6 GHz client penetration. I asked David when this will change, and when we should expect 6 GHz to become more exciting from the client perspective. His answer is twofold: we need (and expect) Apple to add 6E to it’s next round of iPhones- likely to happen in Fall of ’23. And we need more Android phones in the lower price tiers to catch on to 6E chipsets. It’s in flagship Android models, and will eventually make it’s way down-market.
And whether we are talking Wi-Fi 6E or 7 and beyond, David sees a role for 6GHz in high-throughput mesh backhaul. With so many channels to use in 6 GHZ, it’s not unrealistic to remove a few from the client-servicing channel plan and reserve them for mesh duty- not a luxury we really had in either 5 or 2.4 bands. I’m digging that as it could make mesh less “only as a last resort” feeling.
Wi-Fi 7 Right Around the Corner
David rightfully pointed out during our talk that 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6) has been with us for FOUR years. Time flies, especially when measured in WLAN years. He pointed out that WLAN 7 is right around the corner, with the usual absolutely foolish start on the consumer side of the market- like so:
It matters not that there is no Wi-Fi Alliance Wi-Fi 7 testing program yet, or an actual ratified standard… and you just KNOW these things are going to come with moronic default channel widths of 160 or even 320 MHz. It won’t be long before goofy consumer stuff with these foolish defaults interfere with the careful 6 GHz channel plans us enterprise folks use. Some problems just don’t go away.
At the same time, the enterprise players all have their chips selected for eventual WLAN 7 products (Extreme uses Broadcom here) and you just know development is happening furiously behind the scenes in Silly Valley. David says to watch for early enterprise product announcements in Q1 or Q2 of 2024.
One Feature That Actually IS Worth Getting Jazzed Over
Back to the specifics of the 802.11 standards- those words that get translated to features for product marketing. As mentioned above, there has been lots of hype and matching amounts of disappointment with real-world applicability through the years. At best, in David’s words, OFDMA that had so much promise for Wi-Fi 6 “sort of works, sometimes”. There’s a ringing endorsement of the 802.11ax working group if I ever heard one…
Looking forward though, David says again that 6 GHz itself is THE FEATURE to appreciate even as other ones role out with Wi-Fi 7. Think you’ll actually achieve 4K QAM in Wi-Fi 7, as will be hyped out the wazoo? yeah, maybe if you’re inside the AP itself given the high SNR required. On the other hand, MLO (Multi-Link Operation) has the potential to be real and transformative. (Here’s the egghead version of how MLO works.) There will be complexity in the timing across bands in busy environments to let devices send and receive data on multiple bands simultaneously, but when MLO gets there it *should* be impressive.
Even if the QAM promises are overblown for Wi-Fi 7, the assumption is we’ll still see reduced latency and 6 GHz goodness that enable the predicted groundswell of VR and AR applications that the guessers see coming.
Of Wi-Fi and 5G/6G
To me, there is tremendous overlap in the hype that has accompanied both Wi-Fi 6/6E and 5G- both public and private. For some reason, some “journalists” and marketers feel compelled to insist that one or the other has to “win” and eventually dominate. David and I both find that to be silly and rather uninformed as both technologies have their place. And NEWSFLASH: Wi-Fi isn’t going anywhere. It’s just too deeply ingrained in our culture, our personal lives, and our work. Private 5G is still very nichy and likely to stay that way for a while, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value as an alternative wireless offering in specific use cases.
David does predict the Private 5G will become more attractive beyond specific niche scenarios when a couple of convergence milestones are achieved- both Private 5G and WLAN can be managed and monitored in the same framework, and the two technologies can do seamless handovers of clients that support both technologies. We’ll see if either plays out in the years to come.
What else?
We talked about a lot in just a short time. David made sure we didn’t close without getting a few other thoughts in. We did cover some cool stuff to come out of Extreme, but that’s not for public consumption yet. But David does predict that sooner rather than later Wi-Fi is going to have to get cozy with edge computing as both evolve. He also sees more impact from AI/ML beyond anything we see now from vendors who incorporate AI in the WLAN solution. Think about the likes of an always up-to-date Digital Twin copy of your network that you can interact with in test, for example. Cool stuff.
Anyone who has been fortunate enough to hear David Coleman present knows that he’s a fountain of wireless knowledge and a pretty decent industry analyst as well. If you have yet to catch him, make sure you do either in person or online. He’s a must-follow for WLAN professionals.